Page 2 of 2

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 6:23 pm
by gn2
Mel46 wrote:yes the tires wear out faster than on a car
I was having a think about this one the other day.
Typically car tyres last longer but cost more so overall the cost may not be too dissimilar?

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:33 pm
by Taz
I got a parking warning taped around my throttle grip once, for parking on a curb, no fine though. In some cities in Oz you can do so but not where I live :(

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 5:05 pm
by cessna151
gn2 wrote:
Mel46 wrote:yes the tires wear out faster than on a car
I was having a think about this one the other day.
Typically car tyres last longer but cost more so overall the cost may not be too dissimilar?
Lets figure it out shall we...

As for the pcx, i'll asume 5k miles for the rear tire and 10k miles for the front. After 10k miles you need one front ($45) and two rear ($51/each) tires for a total of $147. That's $.0147 per mile.
For my honda civic a 40k mile tire is $85 each or $340 for the set. That's .0085 per mile.

So pcx tires are about 73% more expensive than a car tire.

This was a simplified example. I'd say plus or minus 15% margin of error.

(Prices for michelin city grip tires from motorcyclesuperstore.com, and civic tires from bigotires.com)

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 5:34 pm
by cessna151
Another way to compare would be to simply say for every 10k miles you pay $147 for pcx tires while you only pay $85 for car tires.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 5:46 pm
by gn2
Two points

1: OEM IRC fronts last 15000 miles

2: The OEM rears don't last anywhere near as long as a CityGrip

One tyre for my car costs roughly the same as one scooter tyre but the car is wearing them out four at a time.
Much depends on what car you have, tyres for my old Jag cost double what the Micra tyres cost.

The real problem is the wear rate on the PCX OEM IRC rear tyre, it's just shockingly poor.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 1:29 pm
by cessna151
Tire prices and tire wear vary widely, that's why i mentioned a 15% margin of error. I would even say 25%. I think any way you look at it pcx tires cost significantly more than car tires.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 1:41 pm
by gn2
cessna151 wrote:I think any way you look at it pcx tires cost significantly more than car tires.
Like I said it depends on how much the car tyres cost, there's huge variation.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 4:58 pm
by you you
gn2 wrote:
cessna151 wrote:I think any way you look at it pcx tires cost significantly more than car tires.
Like I said it depends on how much the car tyres cost, there's huge variation.
It's true. On my car before last it used to cost just under £900 for a set of tyres and I'd be lucky to get 10k out of them. Tbh 95% of the time I was just pottering around town so the car and the tyres were wasted

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:22 pm
by Urbanian
cessna151 wrote: For my honda civic a 40k mile tire is $85 each or $340 for the set. That's .0085 per mile.
You make an excellent point.
Further, we got 84,000 miles on the stock tires on our civic.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:11 am
by Taz
at least car tires can be rotated regulary to smooth out the wear. Hard to do on a bike! My 4WD has KumHo all terrain tires. Just love that name!

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 8:07 am
by you you
Taz wrote:at least car tires can be rotated regulary to smooth out the wear. Hard to do on a bike! My 4WD has KumHo all terrain tires. Just love that name!
Strictly speaking you can't rotate modern car tyres. More move them from front to rear and vice versa

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:08 am
by gn2
Depends on the tyre, not all modern car tyres are directional.

My wife's Freelander has Kumho tyres and my car has Kumhos on the rear.
Kumhos are great VFM, I will be getting them on the front when the Bridgestones wear out.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:26 am
by you you
gn2 wrote:Depends on the tyre, not all modern car tyres are directional.

My wife's Freelander has Kumho tyres and my car has Kumhos on the rear.
Kumhos are great VFM, I will be getting them on the front when the Bridgestones wear out.

Sorry. Most good quality tyres are directional.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 1:45 pm
by gn2
There's good quality ones which go both ways.

Re: She's arrived

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:28 pm
by you you
gn2 wrote:There's good quality ones which go both ways.

You would know ;)

She's arrived

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:59 pm
by Alibally
Most good quality tyres are now Asymmetrical not directional. This is when the tread is different on the inside than the outside so they have inner and outer on the sidewalls. Tread patterns vary, some giving particularly good dry grip, some have characteristics designed to enhance wet performance. An asymmetrical tyre offers the best of both worlds by combining the two patterns across the width of the tread.