Page 2 of 2
Re: Burgman 650 rider adds a "new" PCX to the stable
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:49 pm
by maddiedog
^ What? How is that even remotely relevant? Iraq still exports oil -- billions of barrels a year. How about you read some on oil reserves:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves. Iraq is a major exporter, but by no means the only source of oil.
There's certainly not a fuel shortage here -- I pay about $3.50 USD per US gallon. According to
here, you pay 1.3878 pounds per liter, which is $2.23 USD. There are 3.78541 liters in a US gallon, meaning if I bought my gas in the UK, I would pay $8.44 USD per US gallon. Perhaps you should be concerned about Iran?
Re: Burgman 650 rider adds a "new" PCX to the stable
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:42 pm
by gn2
maddiedog wrote:The modern ones have turbofan engines, not jet engines, for better economy.
A turbofan
is a jet engine.
Re: Burgman 650 rider adds a "new" PCX to the stable
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:38 pm
by you you
maddiedog wrote:^ What? How is that even remotely relevant? Iraq still exports oil -- billions of barrels a year. How about you read some on oil reserves:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves. Iraq is a major exporter, but by no means the only source of oil.
There's certainly not a fuel shortage here -- I pay about $3.50 USD per US gallon. According to
here, you pay 1.3878 pounds per liter, which is $2.23 USD. There are 3.78541 liters in a US gallon, meaning if I bought my gas in the UK, I would pay $8.44 USD per US gallon. Perhaps you should be concerned about Iran?
Its relevant because before you get a hard on on what a B52 can do think about what keeps it up in the air. Lovely that you are awash with cheap fuel. Bit more expensive and other countries would be safe
Oh sorry, that's not right is it? Other way around?
Re: Burgman 650 rider adds a "new" PCX to the stable
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:33 pm
by maddiedog
gn2 wrote:maddiedog wrote:The modern ones have turbofan engines, not jet engines, for better economy.
A turbofan
is a jet engine.
Derp. That should have said "The modern ones have turbofan engines, not prop engines, for better economy."
qed wrote:Its relevant because before you get a hard on on what a B52 can do think about what keeps it up in the air. Lovely that you are awash with cheap fuel. Bit more expensive and other countries would be safe
Oh sorry, that's not right is it? Other way around?
What is that sentence supposed to mean? Use punctuation and wording...
I think you're trying to start a political debate, so I'm going to ignore you for the sake of this thread not getting derailed.

Re: Burgman 650 rider adds a "new" PCX to the stable
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:17 am
by gn2
maddiedog wrote:Derp. That should have said "The modern ones have turbofan engines, not prop engines, for better economy."
Errm, the B-52 has
always had jet engines...

Even its predecessor the B-47 had jet engines. (plus rocket boosters for take-off)
Piccy
Re: Burgman 650 rider adds a "new" PCX to the stable
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:45 am
by you you

Fair enough
I'll stick to topic. B52, engines on a burgman post
