JetPilot wrote:chicaboo wrote:
The more expensive Kymco scooters and their engines are reflective of the quality that Kawasaki expect when Kymco badge engineer scooters for them. Their cheaper scooters are built to budget and reflect this, but are reliable and robust non the less.
The first is a REALLY BAD assumption. When Kymco designs a scooter for their own brand, it is intended to be sold at a lower price, and cheap is part of the design from the beginning... It does not compare in any way with the kawasaki that is designed to sell at a much higher price. The fact that they are made in the same factory means NOTHING. You always very wrongly assume that Kymco scooters are equal to Kawasaki simply because they are made by the same factory - WRONG.
Personally, I would rather pay the extra 1000 dollars or even more for a better designed scooter, where better materials are used, that will handle amazingly well, and be trouble free for many years. Buying cheap is always a mistake, and will leave you unhappy in the long run.
Mike
How do you
always misquote people with sweeping generalisations? I drew a line in the sand and made arguments either side of it FFS.
Furthermore, this is the second time I've commented on Kymco scooters, which is apparently tantamount to you saying "I always" blah blah...
I find the small capacity Kymcos have poxy cheap IM coloured plastic as apposed to the painted finish you find on Hondas. Not to my taste.
Kymco's cheaper scooters are also air cooled and carberated to cut costs even further. But are they crap scoots? No, just built to budget.
We only get two of the more premium Kymco scooters in Australia, so I can't speak for the Xciting and other 400cc+ models they sell, so I don't...
When I made my observations of the DT 350i (& Forza) which you lambasted as being WRONG with one exception, I also made mention to some gripes I had.
I mentioned the matte finish body panels and glossy bezel around the steering column do not appear durable IMO, and would likely show wear over time.
I also went on to mention that the under-seat storage capacity was lacking for such a large scooter, which I found disappointing but not deal breaking.
I even said how the floor boards aren't as ergonomic as they are on the Forza, which I even pointed out yet again above. None of this made your RIGHT list...
So how is it that I fly the flag for Kymco in some adoring positive light the way you would have everyone believe? Hmmm? I have no brand loyalty...
I'm just a tall fat guy with wide shoulders that doesn't fit on a Forza that costs $1000 more and needs yet more money spent to be liveable, so why would I?
The DT 350i is a compromise that works for me, and it comes with a 3 year warranty. Tell me about Honda's 12 month limited KM warranty? You need it!
Anyhow, if you look after your bike/scooter and get all the recalls done it should be good for a good few years, whatever you buy.
Oh yeah, I consciously bought a used 2012 153cc Honda PCX over a brand new 2016 163cc Kymco Like 200i for $500+ less. It's the only scooter I've got.
I couldn't find another scooter in the price range with the ergonomics that mattered to me. It's the same story in the 300ccc class with the DT350i & Forza.
If I ever buy a Kymco scooter and it sucks, I will sell it move on. It's that simple. It's not the fanatical scooter religion you make everything out to be...
