Arguments For and Against Continuous float/maintenance Charg
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 10:15 am
Old debate but I have brand new Battery Tender Jr brand chargers and was wondering what other folks experiences are that leave them on for extended periods (several months). I still plan to actually run the engines several times per month but they will be on the charger basically continuously. Experiences? I have heard the negatives from using some cheap (HF) float chargers.
From the Battery Tender web site:
Arguments For and Against Continuous float/maintenance Charging: From the preliminary background on batteries and chargers, positions can be taken for or against continuous float charging.
The main argument against continuous float charging is that the battery will: a) be undercharged, or b) be overcharged, and / or c) be permanently damaged as a result of a) or b).
The main argument for continuous float charging one of convenience in that it is better to have the battery fully charged when you need to use it.
An automatic, well-regulated, temperature-compensated charger can keep the battery fully charged and at the same time minimize the risks of long-term damage to the battery due to either under-charging or over-charging. The alternative is to let the battery internal losses run their course, which for most batteries means that they are fully discharged within a few months. If you forget to recharge them periodically, and they become severely over-discharged, even due to only internal losses, the plates will become severely sulfated. For many batteries, that means that they are permanently damaged. Recommendations for Using the Battery Tender Plus in Continuous Float Mode Charging: The line regulation characteristics of the Battery Tender Plus are excellent; less than 1% for line voltage between 115 VAC and 125 VAC. This charger is temperature compensated and it has a special charging algorithm optimized for sealed, gas-recombinant, AGM, lead acid batteries. Numerous motorcycle owners have reported to Deltran over the years that their batteries have lasted 3 years or more. Before using the Battery Tender charger, they would have to replace their batteries as often as every 6 months.
From the Battery Tender web site:
Arguments For and Against Continuous float/maintenance Charging: From the preliminary background on batteries and chargers, positions can be taken for or against continuous float charging.
The main argument against continuous float charging is that the battery will: a) be undercharged, or b) be overcharged, and / or c) be permanently damaged as a result of a) or b).
The main argument for continuous float charging one of convenience in that it is better to have the battery fully charged when you need to use it.
An automatic, well-regulated, temperature-compensated charger can keep the battery fully charged and at the same time minimize the risks of long-term damage to the battery due to either under-charging or over-charging. The alternative is to let the battery internal losses run their course, which for most batteries means that they are fully discharged within a few months. If you forget to recharge them periodically, and they become severely over-discharged, even due to only internal losses, the plates will become severely sulfated. For many batteries, that means that they are permanently damaged. Recommendations for Using the Battery Tender Plus in Continuous Float Mode Charging: The line regulation characteristics of the Battery Tender Plus are excellent; less than 1% for line voltage between 115 VAC and 125 VAC. This charger is temperature compensated and it has a special charging algorithm optimized for sealed, gas-recombinant, AGM, lead acid batteries. Numerous motorcycle owners have reported to Deltran over the years that their batteries have lasted 3 years or more. Before using the Battery Tender charger, they would have to replace their batteries as often as every 6 months.