mladyraven1 wrote:
OK, so basically I got ripped off

I am single and have been divorced 10 years and so I went alone to get the bike. I thought the extended warranty was a good thing. Duh me I guess. If I just let it go I am out 500 dollars. When I bought the bike and I called Honda, they told me I could go to my mechanic I just had to document what he did and make sure he did everything you are supposed to do when at the different check up times.
Above several people keep talking about breaking the plastic???
So, the little tiny book that came in the bike is the manual so I know what he has to do?
Do I need to get Honda to put it in writing that my having my own mechanic do it will not void the warranty? I bought a 5 year warranty.
I am not really sure what to do would like to get a few more opinions.
Thank you for all of your help.

I'll stop short of saying "ripped off" - but I'll also go so far as to also "tell it as I see it"; Extended warranties are an exercise in risk management - a "gamble" as such. If Honda knew that that gamble was going to cost them more than it made them then they wouldn't offer it. If they "thought" it would cost them more than they made they wouldn't offer it. Basically there's only one situation where they will offer it - and that's the situation where they KNOW that on average they're going to make money offering it. And lets face it - would they know? Answer "Heck Yes" ... because they have all the warranty and service data that's been sent in over the years. So in many ways it's a bit like "the house always wins" in casinos - and they're the house.
But it doesn't stop there ... they want to tip the odds in their favour even more; if it wasn't a condition that their bikes be serviced in accordance with their published schedule then few would get it done because they'd paid for a 5 year "get out of jail free" card - but the other side of the same coin is that if the bike IS regularly serviced - including the scheduled replacement of consumables like belts, tyres, air filters, brake & clutch pads then it's unlikely to ever break down. Possible, yes. But odds-on it won't (a-la my first paragraph).
So I'm not going to say "ripped off" but I would go so far as to say it's an arrangement designed to benefit them 99 times out of 100 and the customer 1 time out of 100. Honda are a business and despite all the "warm fuzzies" that all businesses try to project, fundamentally they're all about making money LONG TERM. And that means things like managing the quality of their product and protecting/managing their reputation.
In terms of maintaining the bike ...
My opinion (which some here will agree with and some won't) Honda (and most others) are "very generous" to their dealers in terms of the amount of servicing that they give the green light for (at our expense). Or to put that another way, I believe that they exploit a fear that "bad things will happen if the bike isn't maintained in accordance with their schedule" - and again, keep in mind that schedules are set with "what's best for the manufacturer" (long term) not what's best for us.
Let me put that in context of my bike; I worked out that over the expected lifespan of my bike I'd be paying 1/2 as much again for official service. I'm an exceptionally pragmatic guy who's been around long enough to look below the surface to try and see what's really going on - and a lot of what was recommended on the bike just didn't add up;
- They recommended that the spark plug be changed every 8,000km - and yet in my car they last well over 100,000km. I know that there are differences, but I still wasn't convinced - and my bike is now at 33,000km on the original plug and still starts in a split second and runs as well as it always does.
- They recommend changing the air filter every 16,000km - I inspected mine and eventually changed it at 30,000 - and even then it wasn't hindering performance.
- They recommend changing the drive belt at 24,000 - mine is currently at 33,000 (although I will change it shortly even though I think it would last a lot longer) (laws of diminishing returns).
- They recommend changing the oil every 8,000km - but I've not liked the way oil looks after 8,000km so I change it myself every 4,000km because I want to give the engine the max life I realistically can.
- They recommend having the valves checked every service - and a lot of panels have to come off to do that (and that takes time and time is money). I ran that past a chap who runs a non-affiliated dealership and he said "it's not a particularly high-revving engine" and "I'd only do it if something indicated that it needed doing" (like being hard to start of not idling well). Hasn't been checked for 32,000km and it's still running as good as the day I bought it.
When I worked in the military on fighter aircraft they introduced a thing called IMP (Improved Maintenance Program) - the "rub" of it was that they were over-servicing many parts and causing more problems than they solved by doing that - so the "improved" part came down to giving many items a functional check and leaving them "as is" if all appeared well - rather than disturbing connectors, panels, seal, and looms to check something more thoroughly when it was pretty certain to be fine anyway. A lot of that translates to the bike.
What I'm suggesting isn't for everyone; if bikes are serviced by a dealer according to a schedule then you're virtually guaranteed to never have a problem -- but you'll pay and pay and pay for that. If they're not serviced according to a schedule then the chances of having a problem increase BUT by how much "depends" ... I like to do my own maintenance and one of the benefits of that is that I've got to know my bike really well; I know how much meat is left on the front and rear brake pads - I know what condition the drive belt is in ... and the tyres etc. My belief is that if I'm more "in touch" with my bike then I'm also almost as unlikely to ever have a problem -- and I'll save a LOT of money in the process. So far it's working well, with the exception of pushing a tyre too far - getting a puncture - and having to have the dealer come and pick up the bike on a trailer (on that note, my STRONG suggestion is to not run a rear tyre past 10,000km nor a front one past 15,000km and check the pressures weekly) (or use a FOBO tyre pressure monitor to "beam" them to your smartphone).
Sorry this is such a novel - but I thought a bit of an education (according to this teacher anyway - as I say, not everyone here agrees with me) may just help you make better decisions. For what it's worth, the first service that you're at now is probably THE most important one because it's the one where 2 lots of oil get changed which flushes out the little bits of metal that are floating around from manufacturing processes - and it's also a good time to check the valve clearances because this is the time they're most likely to be slightly out of spec.
All in all though, I would encourage you to get more involved in the service of your bike - maybe you'll end up doing something yourself - maybe not. It's generally not as hard as people think. Perhaps even ask your preferred mechanic if you can watch and learn whilst he does things - I've found that the more I know about the bike the better the decisions. There's also a wealth of knowledge here about the bike. Some things I think you can't help but learn to do yourself - like adjusting the rear brake freeplay (sounds hellishly technical but in English it means " twisting a nut at the back of the bike until the left brake moves about the same as the right brake before it starts to bite) (It's so quick to do I've even done it waiting for a set of traffic lights to change).
Hope this helps. And welcome to the forums. Sing out if we can help with anything.