You can ride on any bike. You theoretically could do any sort of offroading on any bike, or tour on any bike. I love the PCX because it's light and versatile. I only tour on it sometimes because it's fun, but really, it's horrible for a touring bike and awful for offroads. It's still a load of fun, but not designed for touring or offroads.
Offroads -- yeah definitely my KTM. I have a KTM 125SX and that thing's a beast. I hit a tree on it this weekend while hauling ass up a hill. I kept riding for 3 hours afterwards on one radiator and a bent handlebar. That impact on any other bike would have DESTROYED it. I know that would have totalled a BMW GS, the forks couldn't have withstood the impact.
Touring -- you'll want something big. Like the GS1200. You don't want to be roaring through woodland trails on it, just the occasional light gravel or dirt roads. That's not to say you can't, but it's so big and heavy that it's hard to maneuver. It's perfect for the purposes of the rider in the original post on this thread -- he's having more fun on that GS than most of us ever can on a bike, and it looks like it's performing great. I can't imagine a better platform to build a beast like that on than a big GS.
But, each bike is designed for a purpose, and some are shit regardless. I agree with GN2 that most bikes are utter shit. Some bikes (Harleys) are great for looking at, polishing, and making loud noise, but they're built horrendously. Most Harley engines are built INTENTIONALLY off balance. That's planned stupidity. Or how about the Yamaha Vino? It's a 125cc that does 52mph tops, gets 80mpg at best, and leaves a lot to be desired for handling. It's shit because all the other 125cc scooters on the market, whether they cost more or less, are generally better. There's a lot of great bikes out there, but really, at least 50% of bikes out there have a better alternative for less.
