The pounding cadence of their engines is only rivaled by the generous outpouring of smoke and fumes . . ..




It makes one wonder what it was like to ride one of these machines when it was new and times were different.
Moderator: Modsquad
Your welcome!I'll stick with Honda's battery "hidden in-a-box" model(s).
Thanks for bringing it OldG!
If only the industry didn't pay so much attention to acceleration times, and kept some decent rotating weight on the crankshafts. All those older bikes are delightful because they had decent flywheels, I remember scratching my head not understanding why the old Enfield, BSA and Norton singles had the ease and character they did ..... while the newer 250/441 BSAs back then were so harsh. All was due to a desire to make the engine quickly transition from idle to rev - thus negating all but the lightest flywheel possible. None of the newer "retro-classics" capture the older bikes they intend to replicate for this same reason. I know there are other factors - but I wish someone made a new 600-750cc twin with a decent flywheel .... a flathead would really be nice. JMO, probably very flawed.Old Grinner wrote:Watch these old antiques rise again in glory.
The pounding cadence of their engines is only rivaled by the generous outpouring of smoke and fumes . . ..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It makes one wonder what it was like to ride one of these machines when it was new and times were different.
Old Grinner wrote:The CR500 that just won't quit. If you have a sensitive stomach or are afraid of heights you may not want to watch this.![]()
![]()
![]()