Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

General Honda PCX chat, questions about the PCX, or questions about riding.

Moderator: Modsquad

buddy1976
Forum Benefactor
Forum Benefactor
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 7:13 am
Year: 2013
Color: Red
Location: Doncaster South yorkshire UK
Contact:

Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by buddy1976 »

Just wondering if anyone has tried the City Pro and if so how they compare to City Grip?

http://www.southeastbiker.co.uk/latest_ ... -tyre.html
Honda forza 125 2019
Malossi multivar 2000 with 8.5gr rollers
Yellow malossi contra spring
Malossi delta clutch and bell
Malossi special kevlar belt
K and n air filter
Akrapovic exhaust
BC BCTX7L-FP-S LiFePO4 Battery

Honda Pcx 125 esp 2012 uk model
Malossi Multivar 10.5g rollers
Malossi White Contra Spring
Malossi yellow clutch springs
Daytona reinforced belt
ADVANCEPro Large Diameter Drive Face
ADVANCEPro PCX125 Fi High Rigidity Bearing Slider
DNA Performance air filter
Removed air box flange
Removed seat hump
Ermax+25 windshield
User avatar
gn2
Forum Benefactor
Forum Benefactor
Posts: 7767
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:54 pm
Year: None
Location: NE Scotland

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by gn2 »

Not available in the corect size for the rear, only the front.
So a matched pair of City Grips in the correct sizes is the better option.
Four decades on two wheels has taught me nothing, all advice given is guaranteed to be wrong
User avatar
homie
Prestige
Prestige
Posts: 6103
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:49 pm
Year: 2015 PCX150
Color: Pearl White
Location: FloridaLand

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by homie »

- 20 per cent more puncture-resistant than rival products.

- 10 percent longer lifespan than that of its competitors.

- new tread pattern delivers enhanced grip on dry, wet and slippery surfaces.

all good but I would like to know how much heavier it is since we are talking 150cc application.
Image
iceman
Forum Benefactor
Forum Benefactor
Posts: 2857
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:43 pm
Year: 2014 125 (LED)
Color: White
Location: London, England

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by iceman »

Specs sounds like marketing speak - they need to provide proof and comparisons to 'real' tyres to mean anything - have they proved those claims?
Image
User avatar
homie
Prestige
Prestige
Posts: 6103
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:49 pm
Year: 2015 PCX150
Color: Pearl White
Location: FloridaLand

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by homie »

iceman wrote:Specs sounds like marketing speak - they need to provide proof and comparisons to 'real' tyres to mean anything - have they proved those claims?
They are competing with themselves here, might backfire if all lies :lol: we already love the City Grip so much they risk huge credibility and lose overall sales if proven to be liars. You may be right, could be crap but I wish they listed weight specs.
Image
gasolina77
New Member
New Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:59 am
Year: 2
Color: Black

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by gasolina77 »

i was wondering could i use something like a 15 inch wheel for the PCX ? i just want it to look taller ( i have changed the front shock + rear shock to make it 3cm higher )
User avatar
easyrider
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 6:23 pm
Year: 2013
Color: blk
Location: Long Island , NY, Tampa, Ft laud

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by easyrider »

Any tire that improves puncture resistance is better in my view especially for you guys that do excessive high speed riding on freeways and the like. Additionally,they tout better grip and life expectancy so the rubber compound is improved as well. A little more weight, perhaps , but if you value life and limb over a few clicks on the speedo the trade off is nominal.
User avatar
homie
Prestige
Prestige
Posts: 6103
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:49 pm
Year: 2015 PCX150
Color: Pearl White
Location: FloridaLand

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by homie »

easyrider wrote:Any tire that improves puncture resistance is better in my view especially for you guys that do excessive high speed riding on freeways and the like. Additionally,they tout better grip and life expectancy so the rubber compound is improved as well. A little more weight, perhaps , but if you value life and limb over a few clicks on the speedo the trade off is nominal.
Agreed... tires do make a big difference on the little PCX, you guys riding the IRC's have my appreciation. The stock tires are the bare minimum Honda could install to get you the fuel efficiency and make the claims. If I put those back on it might scare the hell out of me :lol:
Image
iceman
Forum Benefactor
Forum Benefactor
Posts: 2857
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:43 pm
Year: 2014 125 (LED)
Color: White
Location: London, England

Re: Michelin City Pro vs City Grip?

Post by iceman »

homie wrote:
iceman wrote:Specs sounds like marketing speak - they need to provide proof and comparisons to 'real' tyres to mean anything - have they proved those claims?
They are competing with themselves here, might backfire if all lies :lol: we already love the City Grip so much they risk huge credibility and lose overall sales if proven to be liars. You may be right, could be crap but I wish they listed weight specs.
I'm still one of those that have had zero issues with the stock IRC's in what is now 2yr's 365/yr riding - all weathers with heavy rain and flooded roads - but this is 30-4omph riding. Lots of people prefer the MCG's and they may be better, just can't call the stock tyres 'widow makers', 'crap', or other terms peope use, and the rear still has lots of life in it.
Image
Post Reply