
We just tried a current model PCX vs Piaggio's new Medley 125. Is this a fair review or are you going to shoot us down?
http://www.scooterlab.uk/honda-pcx125-v ... io-medley/
Moderator: Modsquad
U.K. Licensing laws are different from here in the U.S. We don't have a graduated licensing system, they do. In the UK, and a lot of other countries, <125cc is the beginner license level. From what I understand, there is an intermediate level and an expert level, but I don't know the specifics. Anyway, this is why manufacturers sell 125cc bikes in the UK, while here in the U.S., any moron with a motorcycle learner's permit can walk into a Suzuki dealer, buy a 150 hp super bike and wreck it on their way off the dealer's lot.thunderkat59 wrote:Cool article.
So UK still gets the 125?? USA gets a 150?
Sort of weird. A little?
You can't ride a powerful bike as a novice, you must take a test. One test is fine, but 3 tests is really a bit much. And that still won't stop throttle-happy dumbos from turning themselves into burgers on sportsbikes.Alibally wrote:Nice review. I like the styling of the PCX better though but I'm biased since I've got one.
I know what your saying about the license laws regarding bikes, but as I have just been through it I think there has to be a system in place to stop the Darwin Award candidates killing themselves. It would be wrong to let a complete novice on a powerful bike without any decent training.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Journalistic hysteria.Sticky wrote:3 tests is really a bit much
If you read again what is written you seem to be agreeing with the text.gn2 wrote:"The latest systems really are very good and the electronics behind it are cleverer and have better reactions than most humans."
Not entirely accurate.
No human can outperform ABS.
Fair enough. I agree.Did you mention that the Piaggio has a KPH biased speedo?
Some people find these substandard instruments entirely unacceptable.
Also a good point. Services interval on the Medley is 10,000km (6,200 miles) which is pretty good.Did you mention service interval?
This is just as important as fuel economy.
The stepped licence system does not debar anyone from going from a 125 on L-plates direct to a big bike, they just need to wait till they're 24.
honkerman wrote: U.K. Licensing laws are different from here in the U.S. We don't have a graduated licensing system, they do. In the UK, and a lot of other countries, <125cc is the beginner license level. From what I understand, there is an intermediate level and an expert level, but I don't know the specifics. Anyway, this is why manufacturers sell 125cc bikes in the UK, while here in the U.S., any moron with a motorcycle learner's permit can walk into a Suzuki dealer, buy a 150 hp super bike and wreck it on their way off the dealer's lot.
Tbh, I think the UK system isn't a bad idea.
Sticky wrote:We used to have a good system where you could ride a 125 as a learner,
Now we have a stupid EU stepped license system which only allows bigger engines at certain ages and after other tests.
Bad riders on Superbikes could easily kill themselves on a 125 as well.
1. Compulsory Basic Training to ride anything (training and certificate)gn2 wrote:Journalistic hysteria.Sticky wrote:3 tests is really a bit much
No-one is forced to do three full tests.
Not so, talented racers will stop quicker without ABS, certainly primitive systems. ABS lets the brakes off when it detects a difference in wheel speed but obviously its quicker to stop (if you have the skill) if you don't let the brakes off at all and brake as hard as traction will allow.gn2 wrote:You said "most humans".
Not so, it should read "humans"
Sticky wrote:I guess 24-year-olds are so much more mature than 23-year-olds...
Fact is that motorcycle ABS is a reactive system. It interferes when there is a speed differential between front and rear and lets the brake off. Please explain how that will make for a shorter stopping distance than Marquez and friends slowing down with the rear wheel in the air?Here's the Internet BMW Rider's account of Motorcycle Consumer News's tests. They like ABS. Though they note a small disimprovement in braking times in perfect conditions, in the wet ABS performance was brilliant. Stopping distance for the best rider (the track racer) was reduced by a third and the performance of the worst rider improved to be almost as good as the best. Although expert riders could always make the non-ABS bike stop quicker than the ABS bike, this difference was small, and ABS helped the less expert riders in the group stop significantly better. The disadvantage of ABS for the experts goes away quickly when conditions are not optimal. ABS seems like the great equalizer.
Sticky wrote:1. Compulsory Basic Training to ride anything (training and certificate)gn2 wrote:Journalistic hysteria.Sticky wrote:3 tests is really a bit much
No-one is forced to do three full tests.
2. To ride a 125 without L-plates under 19 you need to do A Test.
3. To ride bigger than 125 (>46.6hp) before age 24 you need A1 Test
4. Wait to age 24 with previous test passes or take Direct Access.
It's so simple it takes 5 pages to explain https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... icence.pdf
Either way, it's a stupid system. I guess 24-year-olds are so much more mature than 23-year-olds...
I agree. I think it would be good for motorcycling in general here in the U.S. If there were a graduated system based on rider skill and ability. I can't remember off-hand, I think it was in cycle world, but I recently saw a statistic that indicates the majority of motorcycle crashes in the US are single vehicle wrecks. Speeding, hot-dogging, and so on, were contributing factors. It's probably a culture thing, but I think a lot of it has to do with kids getting high end bikes they aren't ready for. Heh, a kid at the motorcycle tech school I'm attending bought a used 2014 interceptor last week and crashed it in the lot...of the Harley dealer he works for. He apparently crashed it again over the weekend. Too much bike for a kid who probably shouldn't be allowed to use a leaf blower.thunderkat59 wrote:honkerman wrote: U.K. Licensing laws are different from here in the U.S. We don't have a graduated licensing system, they do. In the UK, and a lot of other countries, <125cc is the beginner license level. From what I understand, there is an intermediate level and an expert level, but I don't know the specifics. Anyway, this is why manufacturers sell 125cc bikes in the UK, while here in the U.S., any moron with a motorcycle learner's permit can walk into a Suzuki dealer, buy a 150 hp super bike and wreck it on their way off the dealer's lot.
Tbh, I think the UK system isn't a bad idea.Sticky wrote:We used to have a good system where you could ride a 125 as a learner,
Now we have a stupid EU stepped license system which only allows bigger engines at certain ages and after other tests.
Bad riders on Superbikes could easily kill themselves on a 125 as well.
OK, Thats right! I forgot about that! Thats why you guys get those great Aprilia 125, 2-stroke road race reps and such.
I think its a great idea. Here, a 600cc bike is considered an 'beginners bike' bu the nu-gen sportbike kiddies. Those
"beginner bikes" run wide and create havoc on every curvy road in our state. Insane crash rate within first 90 days
of ownership according to my insurance agent . . .
1992?Sticky wrote:here's the evidence of what I say. http://www.bikesafer.com/abs.html